The ethical trap discussion and reply to jeffrey and edward

My discussion:         

Prior to beginning your discussion response, read The ethical trap (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..  Discuss an ethical dilemma that you are aware of in an organization.   Describe how the ethical dilemma  was an ethical trap. Evaluate how the  ethical dilemma and the ethical trap could have been avoided.

Your response must be a minimum of 300 words.

Guided Response: Review several of your classmates’  posts and respond to at least two of your peers by 11:59 p.m. on Day 7  of the week. You are encouraged to post your required replies early  during the week to promote more meaningful interactive discourse in the  discussion. When responding to your classmates, offer additional  suggestions that could help to avoid either the ethical dilemma or the  associated ethical trap.

Your responses must be a minimum of 150 words.

Reply to Jeffreys discussion below:


For  this ethical trap discussion, I will describe a situation that I was  faced with several years ago. I was a database architect for a publicly  traded company. I worked very closely with the company’s treasurer to  develop a report that was going to be used to report financial  information to shareholders, investors, and credit facilities. After  weeks of gathering requirements and developing the report, I thought we  finally had a good solution. The report used data that we pulled from  external sources and loaded into the data warehouse. Having worked with  data for many years, this is normally the process; get data from the  source systems and use it for accurate reporting.

However, much to my surprise I later found out that the treasurer was  using the report as more of a starting point or ‘guideline’ and was  then filling in the blanks and actually changing numbers to what he  thought they should be. This didn’t feel right to me because if we could  just change numbers on what seemed like a whim, how could we justify  our numbers to investors, credit facilities, and stockholders? How could  this be SOX compliant? I was in an ethical dilemma. Should I confront  the treasurer and risk him getting upset or defensive? Should I not say  anything and potentially put the company at risk?

An ethical trap consists of a primary and a secondary ethical  decision. If I didn’t say anything and the company was later found to  have fraud through an audit, was I also to blame? I needed to ask myself  two questions: what should I do and what will I do? I needed to weigh  actions that would benefit myself or the organization.

In the end, I decided to raise the issue with my superior, the CIO.  We talked about it and decided that it would be a good idea to have a  conversation with us, the treasurer, and the CFO. We had the  conversation and described our concerns. The treasurer described his  procedure and reasons for what he was doing. The CFO seemed to agree  with what he was doing but also thanked me for raising the concerns. The  treasurer was understanding and acknowledged that I was just looking  out for the good of the company. Thankfully he did not hold any bad  feelings towards me.

I still feel that this was the best possible way to handle the  ethical dilemma. By making a good ethical decision right away, I was  able to avoid the ethical trap. Had I made a bad ethical decision and  looked the other way, I could have spring-loaded the trap potentially  resulting in other conflicts, legal, or administrative actions had  things gone differently.

Reply to Edwards discussion below:


There  was an ethical dilemma at my current work from home job when I was in  training grouped with several other associates. We broke apart in  training sessions after taking live calls to discuss what type of calls  we took and practice learning new information about company services and  products while communicating through headsets with each other. I  remember 2 of the employees talked about how they wrote down a few of  the customers credit card numbers because they seemed wealthy due to the  vacation package they purchased. They also mentioned how they were  going to unplug their systems and argue to tech support how their  computers froze to get time off the phones. At first, I didn’t realize  was in the ethical trap or could be held accountable for situation for  not reporting it to upper management because I played no action in  participating with what they were doing.

What we didn’t know was that are training sessions were not private  because everybody was being recorded and supervisors listen to them  randomly. While the associates who were stealing company time and  customers financial information were terminated, the rest of the group  was giving a onetime warning for not immediately reporting the  information. “When making ethical decisions, people conduct a personal  risk-benefit analysis. Studies confirmed that people confronted with  ethical decisions do less than they believe they should do and choose a  course of action that benefits themselves over the benefit of others”  (Schafer, 2011).

I could have easily avoided receiving a verbal warning if I had told  my training supervisor what the associates discussed but I did not want  to be portrayed as an informant which is why I remained silent. Being  labeled on the job as a snitch or a tattle on the job will cause other  colleagues to have a negative perception about you on the job which will  put you in isolation from everybody else. A few months later other  employees were involved in the same situation again and they were fired  as well with the culprit because they didn’t want to be viewed as an  informant which cost them their job.


Schafer, J. (2011, Apr. 16). The ethical trap. Once caught in the ethical trap, few people can escape. Retrieved from (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Enjoy 10% OFF today with the coupon code: save10